{"id":2003,"date":"2022-03-29T19:45:47","date_gmt":"2022-03-29T19:45:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/radiesse.m3rzd3v.com\/?page_id=2003"},"modified":"2026-02-11T10:55:29","modified_gmt":"2026-02-11T15:55:29","slug":"patient-satisfaction","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/merzaesthetics-ca.m3rzd3v.com\/fr\/radiesse\/hcp\/patient-satisfaction\/","title":{"rendered":"Satisfaction des patients"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Patient satisfaction<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

with RADIESSE\u00ae<\/sup><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

In clinical studies, RADIESSE\u00ae<\/sup> patients were more satisfied with the results they received from treatments with Radiesse\u00ae<\/sup> versus other fillers.1,2<\/sup>\u00a0In a head-to-head, 12-month study\u00a0comparing RADIESSE\u00ae<\/sup> to Restylane\u00ae<\/sup>\u00a0Injectable Gel, 67% of patients preferred Radiesse treatment.2<\/sup><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Actual patients. Individual results may vary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Radiesse\u00ae<\/sup>\u00a0vs Restylane\u00ae<\/sup><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Percent of Subjects Preferring the RADIESSE\u00ae<\/sup> Result2<\/sup><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

P<\/em> Values
p<\/em><.001 – 6 months
p<\/em><0.0001-6 & 12 Months<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>
\n

60 patients were enrolled in a European, randomized, split-face controlled study evaluating efficacy, safety, durability, and volume. The treating physician could use the volume they determined necessary to achieve full correction. Preference was determined in a blinded manner. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Data shown reflect subjective assessments, not clinical endpoints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Expand for Image Description<\/summary>\n

Table shows results of patients\u2019 preference of Radiesse or Restylane at 6, 9, and 12 months. Of the 59 people answering, 64% preferred Radiesse at 6 months. Of the 58 respondents at 9 months, again 64% preferred Radiesse. At 12 months, Radiesse is preferred by 67% of the 58 people being surveyed.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n

RADIESSE\u00ae<\/sup> vs Juv\u00e9derm\u00ae<\/sup> <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Percent of Subjects Satisfied and Extremely Satisfied1<\/sup><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

P<\/em> Values
p<\/em><.001 – 6 months<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>
\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Expand for Image Description<\/summary>\n

The graph represents the percentage of subjects who reported that they are satisfied or extremely satisfied at 4, 8, and 12 months between Radiesse and Juv\u00e9derm 24. At 4 months, 97% of Radiesse patients were satisfied or extremely satisfied compared to 20% of Juv\u00e9derm 24 respondents who were similarly satisfied. At 8 months, 95% of Radiesse patients were satisfied or extremely satisfied compared to 6% of Juv\u00e9derm 24 patients. At 12 months, 90% of Radiesse patients were satisfied or extremely satisfied compared to 7% for Juv\u00e9derm 24.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n

Become a provider<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Contact us if you would like more information about becoming a RADIESSE\u00ae<\/sup><\/strong> provider.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
No<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n